Index
|
|
D
dakini Sanskrit word for
"sky dancer," a female tutelary diety, often of frightful aspect,
who teaches and tests those on the path of Tantric
enlightenment.
Dalai Lama Honorific title of Tenzin
Gyatso (born 1931), the chief spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism,
recognized world-wide as Nobel laureate for Peace.
Among native Tibetans and many Westerners who
embrace Tibetan Buddhism, the Dalai Lama is recognized
as the 14th incarnation of a persistent awareness believed to
have been
embodied in thirteen previous personalities. From its
origins in the 6th
Century BCE, Buddhism abounds with tales of reincarnation,
some of them closely linked to historical personalities, but
the ritual
of enthroning reincarnate masters appears to date from
around 1450. (Ngawang Zangpo, 19) The most recent example of
this phenomenon
is the
reincarnation of Kalu Rinpoche, a revered lama well-known
in the
West, who died in 1989. In 1991 the Dalai Lama announced
that the awareness of Kalu Rinpoche had been reborn on September
17,
1990 in a child named Poontsok Chopel, magnificent one who spreads the
Buddha teaching. (Ibid., p. 46)
The belief in reincarnation is essential to all
schools of Buddhism, even its most popular forms, yet the mechanism
of re-embodiment is largely a matter of esoteric teaching. It is
believed that certain lamas of high spiritual attainment can direct
their reincarnations consciously and return to the human fold for
the sake of assisting other human beings to achieve liberation. The
way that deceased lamas navigate through the after-death states (bardos)
and find their way back into embodiment seems to depend upon their
being supported and monitored by a community of monks and masters
who preserve a strict vigil during the 49 days usually allotted for
the transition. The spiritually advanced man or woman capable of
such a feat of conscious rebirth is called a tulku, meaning altar, shrine. This
term implies the belief that the human person in whom
the lama is re-embodied is like an altar-seat
occupied by the presence of a higher, trans-human awareness.
The Tibetan word kundun, meaning simply presence, was
applied to the Dalai Lama in his childhood. Kundun is the
title of the film based on the life of Tenzin Gyatso, directed by
Martin Scorcese.
Upon rebirth, the reincarnated lama is sought by
a specialized team called tulku-finders. Stories of how the
reincarnated lama is able to recognize the personal articles of his
preceding incarnation are common in Tibetan tradition, and taken
literally. The stories seem to prove that the belief in this special
process of reincarnation is founded on real evidence.
Western spiritual traditions such as
Rosicrucianism also transmit stories representing the belief in the
serial reincarnation of masters who deliberately reappear in
different epochs of time to guide humanity and initiate social and
scientific advances. (Lash, S)
Deadsea rolls
Upcoming
Declaration of Independence The formal
statement drafted by the Founding Fathers of the American colonies,
whose immediate purpose was to declare their political independence
from England but whose larger purpose was to enshrine the guiding
principles of the American way of life. Certain beliefs encoded in
the Declaration have deeply affected the role of the United States
in world affairs. Other beliefs about this document and how
it came to be written are currently subject to widespread
controversy.
The belief in a God-given right to life, liberty
and the pursuit of happiness deeply informs the American
way of life. If it be accepted that belief drives behavior one of the
primary assumptions of metahistory then it is rather obvious
that the belief in the pursuit of happiness drives consumer
society. There is actually a compound belief operating here: the
belief
in the right to pursue happiness is compounded with the
belief that consuming and owning will make people happy. Hence Americans
widely believe they have the right to lay claim to a
huge percent
of the resources of the planet in order to pursue their
notion of happiness.
deep ecology Social-philosophical
movement defined by Arne Naess that asserts the value of nature independent
of human uses for it.
More forthcoming.
default belief: A belief held
due to lack of considering any alternatives.
Example: in Saudi Arabia all religions except Islam are illegal. Saudis who embrace Islam
do so by default, lacking the possibility to consider any alternatives. All other creeds
are against the law, so everyone is Muslim by default. The same situation applies for
anyone born in a culture and country where a belief-system is universally imposed. Born
into the Hindu culture of India, one is a Hindu by default. Born into the Southern Baptist
culture of the American Bible Belt, one is a Baptist by defaulf.
Default beliefs are transmitted by tradition through family, school and church. In the
world today, there is no country or culture that asserts the right to grow up without
default beliefs being imposed.
For a complete list of permutations of belief see Modes of Believing.
defusing belief: one of the three main of metacritique,
the other two being assessing belief and dereasoning belief.
See Defusing Belief
.
dehumanization. The process of becoming
less than human, or contributing to and or participating in anything
that makes it possible for human beings to live at a diminished
potential.
deism Belief in a creator god who does not
intervene in creation by supernatural means and stands detached
from human affairs (paring his nails, as one character irreverently
says in James Joyces Ulysses). Deists believe that nature
sufficiently demonstrates the divine capacities of the creator god
who masterminded it and manifested it. This belief leaves open the
question of how God might view human affairs; i.e., with approval or
disapproval.
[This entry is being edited. What follows is a
rough draft.]
Sophia is an Aeon, a dreaming god. Aeons dream and emanate
worlds, but they do not always penetrate into the worlds they produce.
In this sense, they might be compared to scientists of a wise and benevolent
kind - if, indeed, we can imagine such scientists - who set up an experiment
and let its run its course, without interfering in how it unfolds. To put
ourselves in the minds of the Aeons, we must imagine that the experimental
worlds they produce are more interesting if they don't intervene in them
once initial conditions have been set up. Nevertheless, many mythologies
do refer to the intervention of deific beings in the human world. We would
do well to ask which of these stories are true and helpful, and which are
delusional, or intentionally distorted by malicious scripting.
Sophia's involvement in her extra-Pleromic emanation is anomalous, a freak
event. It comprises two aspects: a non-intentional plunge, followed by
a redemptive return movement. Dreaming of how to projet a world all by
Herself, Sophia departs from the vortex of higher-dimensional star-flux
in the galactic core and plunges down and out, out and away, into the swirling
elementary matter in the galactic limbs. This is the first descent described
in the paraphrase. Then there is an intermediary phase, the second descent,
in which She imparts animation to the world-process She has instigated.
Then there is the ricorso or redemptive action in which Sophia,
working through a special power that She endows in humanity, brings correction
to the cosmic process She has inaugurated.
Correction is required in the cosmic order because Sophia's initial Dreaming
was skewed.
When the term first appeared in 1564, deism was
associated with the views of religiously minded people who opposed
Bible-based religion. Later, it became synonymous with the label
of freethinker. In his Dictionary of 1755, Samuel Johnson
defined the deist as a man who follows no particular religious
but acknowledges the existence of God, without any other article of
faith. Politically and ethically, deism has been associated
with movements that tend toward religious tolerance, the idealization
of the natural capacities of the human species, and
the promotion
of free speech and political liberty.
Many of the Founding Fathers of the United
States were deists who debated how to keep religion out of
government. Thomas Jefferson, who compiled his own Bible from
selected passages in the New Testament, rejected the supernaturalism
of Christianity and viewed Jesus as a teacher of morality rather
than the incarnation of divinity. George Washington firmly advocated
the separation of church from state and struggled to keep any
reference to Deity out of the Constitution. When questioned directly
on his views by a diplomat, Joel Barlow, then American consul to
Algiers, the first president responded flatly: The Government of
the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the
Christian religion. Curiously, the question had originally
been put to Barlow from a Muslim leader in Tripoli. This shows that
at that early date some religious leaders in the Arab
world were
closely observing the formation of the new nation, perhaps
comparing it with their own version of fundamentalist theocracy.
(EP 2,
334)
The debate continues today, with fundamentalists
insisting on the central role of religion in government. Like
Ronald Reagan before them, Presidents Bush, pere et fils, play
up religion strongly and adhere to a literal interpretation of the
Bible, especially the passages on Armageddon. Deists view the
Bible as a fallible text contrived by priests for the purposes of
controlling the populace. See also theism.
deliberated belief: chosen by a process
of considering and evaluating options. Synonymous with aligned belief.
Example: Christianity is a religion embraced by billions but
rarely chosen by anyone. Choosing requires alternatives to choose among,
and alternatives have to be deliberated
before a wise, heartfelt choice can be made. This rarely happens
in the adoption of beliefs, especially religious beliefs.
The intelligent effort required to deliberate beliefs may account
for the fact that most humans passively accept the beliefs imposed
upon them, yet this explanation is
paradoxical. If beliefs are so important, so deeply held in the
heart of the believer, how can we allow ourselves to adopt them blindly
rather than by careful deliberation?
If what we believe is so important. why do we acquire our beliefs
so superficially?
Metahistory proposes that these troubling questions can be explored,
although not perhaps ultimately resolved. Exposing reflex belief and
dereasoning are two potent
metacritical tools that may allow to get to the bottom of paradox
concerning the rarity of deliberated belief.
For a complete list of permutations of belief see Modes of Believing.
dereasoned belief: deprived
of its original properties by the process of dereasoning,
i.e., isolating the conditions
and reasons
for holding a belief and thus reducing it to its inherent
truth value, if it has any.
For a complete list of permutations of belief see Modes of Believing.
dereasoning: The process in metacritique
in which we separate the reasons and conditions for adopting
a belief from its truth value. This process, comparable
to pulling taffy without getting it stuck to your fingers,
is demonstrated in Socratic Sessions
#1.
The process of dereasoning beliefs suggests an analogy
to the chemical process of denaturing. To denature a
substance is "to modify (e.g., a protein) by heat,
acid, etc., so that some of the original structure of
the molecule is lost and its properties are changed." (The
Penguin Concise English Dictionary, 2002) Normally we
encounter beliefs (both those held by others and by ourselves)
in a mature state, exhibiting a coherent form like the
structure of a molecule. The components of a belief
include the conditions in which it was acquired and the
reasons for holding it, the how
and why of believing. To dereason a belief is to break
down and separate these components so that its properties
are changed. It is the same belief, but denatured,
dereasoned.
Metacritique proposes that only by looking at dereasoned
beliefs can we determine their intrinsic truth value.
In practice, this may not
always be possible, and we may be left in total ambivalence
regarding the truth of the belief under consideration...
Nevertheless, the best chance of arriving at the truth
value of a belief,
if it has any, is by dereasoning it.
desacralization: the process of separating
from the Sacred or from Sacred Nature. Also, the process of losing
the sense for the presence of non-human and supernatural powers
both in the world and within the human psyche. See also mythic
dissociation.
description The essential purpose of a
story or narration: namely, to describe human experience and
so preserve the lesson inherent to that experience. (This definition
proposes that all human experience is or can be a learning process.)
More often than not, an event or action is described in a way
that incorporates certain belief toward the matters being recounted.
Metahistory is a method of looking at modes of description to
see what beliefs they carry.
discarnation:
upcoming
dissenting belief: deliberately opposed
to conventional and established beliefs.
Example: the belief that it is patriotic to resist certain policies
of the US government emerged in America during the invasion of Iraq.
Dissenting belief often
comes into play on the rebound, in direct response to a situation,
so it initially displays a negative or reactive character.
For a complete list of permutations of belief see Modes of Believing.
doctrinal belief: based on predefined
dogmas or doctrines. Contrast to intuitive belief.
Example: that the essence of life is suffering due to the impermanence
of all things is a doctrinal belief of Buddhism. This is close to textual
belief because the belief
is not merely inferred and does not arise from an interpretation,
it is directly stated in the written texts of Buddhism.
A belief may be doctrinal and not textual. The Old Testament
presents the story of the Fall, telling how the primordial parents
Adam and Eve are expelled from the Garden
of Eden by Jehovah. In the 4th Century CE Saint Augustine proposed
the doctrinal belief that the entire human race inherits a moral flaw
due to the sin of the first parents.
Strictly speaking, this belief is not textually stated in the
story of the Fall, but beginning with Augustine it has been assumed
that the OT narrative encodes this belief.
Hence a doctrinal belief is an interpretation of a story, but
a textual belief is directly stated in the story. Textual belief is
also doctrinal, because it forms part of the doctrine
of the religion, but doctrinal belief is not always textual.
For a complete list of permutations of belief see Modes of Believing.
dynamic belief Any
belief that that carries deep conviction and motivational power,
as distinguished from conjectural belief,
mere suppostion or subjective opinion. Also called core belief. All beliefs
are dynamic in the sense that beliefs drive behavior, but the motivational
power of may be blind and compulsive.
|
|